The latest CBOS study also found that 3-out-of-10 believe it should be mandatory for everyone (29 percent), while relatively few say that it should be mandatory only for selected groups (12 percent).

Between 16-26 August, the Public Opinion Research Center asked respondents about their fears of coronavirus infection, the assessment of government policy towards the epidemic and their attitude to COVID-19 vaccination.

Nearly half of the respondents said they are afraid of coronavirus infection (48 percent), and a little more than half do not have such fears (51 percent). The fear of coronavirus infection largely depends on age, with over half of the respondents in the 45+ age group, and nearly two-thirds (63 percent) in the 65+ group. 

Among the younger respondents (up to 45 years old) the majority are not afraid of an infection, and in the case of the youngest (18-24 years old), a huge majority (80 percent) said they had no concerns. 

Compared to July, the percentage of people who have received at least one dose of the vaccine increased (7 percentage points, to 62 percent), and the percentage of people declaring their intention to vaccinate decreased (by 5 points, to 9 percent). The share of those reluctant to vaccinate did not change (26 percent). The percentage of the respondents with no opinion on the subject remains at a stable, low level (3 percent).

The study also found that the attitude towards vaccination depends largely on the concerns related to the coronavirus infection. People who are more less afraid of infection more often declare reluctance to vaccinate. Among those not afraid of infection at all, every second respondent does not intend to vaccinate.

In addition, older respondents have a more positive attitude to vaccinations. A relatively small number of 65+ respondents do not want to vaccinate (13 percent, compared to 35 percent among the youngest respondents). Similarly, people living in the largest cities (13 percent), graduates of universities and respondents from households with per capita incomes of at least PLN 3,000 (17 percent in each case). In socio-professional groups, a more positive attitude to vaccinations is declared by pensioners (15 percent do not intend to vaccinate), management staff and specialists with higher education (14 percent).

According to over half of the respondents, vaccination against COVID-19 should be completely voluntary (54 percent). Three out of ten believe that it should be mandatory for everyone (29 percent), while relatively few believe that it should be mandatory only for selected groups (12 percent).

When it comes to mandatory vaccinations, Poles would like to include employees of the health care system (95 percent), employees of social assistance houses (87 percent), and teachers (82 percent). Also mentioned are uniformed services (76 percent) and, a little less often, employees of trade and services (58 percent and 52 percent respectively). A small part of the respondents name other groups, which include: older people, officials, priests and generally people who have contact with a large number of people (a total of 19 percent).

More than half of the respondents are against the introduction of restrictions on the use of public places, such as shopping centres, restaurants, cinemas, etc. for non-vaccinated persons (unless they are convalescents or have the current negative result of the coronavirus test), and slightly more than one third support such restrictions (35 percent). Vaccinated people support this solution more often, and taking into account socio-demographic characteristics - older people (49% in the 65+ age group), those living in the largest cities (48 percent), university graduates (43 percent), those with per capita incomes in a household of at least PLN 3 thousand (48 percent), and in socio-professional groups - pensioners (48 percent), self-employed and medium-level personnel, technicians (45 percent in each group).

Also, more than half of the respondents (59 percent) believe that employers have no right to require employees to vaccinate against COVID-19, and people supporting such a right of employers are a minority (35 percent).

Compared to the previous measurement, there is no significant change of the assessment of government activities in combating the epidemic. Like in July, more than half of the respondents have a positive opinion on the government's activities in this area (55 percent, increase by 2 points in relation to July), and more than one third (36 percent, decrease by 2 points) have a negative opinion.

The older respondents (76 percent in the 65+ age group), those living in the countryside (60 percent) or in smaller cities below 100,000. residents (57-60 percent depending on the category), with basic / junior high school education (65 percent) or basic vocational education (67 percent), and in socio-professional groups pensioners (73 percent) and farmers (70 percent) more often declare their satisfaction with the government activities aimed at combating the coronavirus epidemic.

Opinions on the government's steps to combat the epidemic mainly depend on political views and supported parties. Almost three-quarters of the respondents identifying with the right (74 percent) are satisfied with the steps taken by the government, and nearly half of the respondents with leftist political views are critical of them (49 percent). In potential party electorates, the vast majority of PiS supporters (together with Solidarna Polska) positively asses the actions of the government in this area, while supporters of opposition parties perceive them more negatively. Supporters of Konfederacja have the worst opinion on the government's activity in this area, the majority of them declare dissatisfaction.

The study was carried out in a mixed-mode procedure on a representative name sample of adult Polish residents, drawn from the PESEL register. The study was carried out on 16-26 August 2021 on a sample of 1167 people (including: 62.4 percent with the CAPI method, 23.5 percent with the CATI method and 14.1 percent with the CAWI method). (PAP)

Author: Olga Zakolska

ozk/ mhr/ kap/

tr. RL